Renault Captur 2012 vs Peugeot 2008 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 0.9 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 135 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Renault Captur engine produces 20 HP less power than Peugeot 2008, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Peugeot 2008. Due to the lower power, Renault Captur reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.7 | |
| Renault Captur consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Renault Captur could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1250 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Renault Clio, Dacia Logan, Nissan Micra, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2013 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.12 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.57 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Renault Captur is 4 cm shorter than the Peugeot 2008, 4 cm wider, while the height of Renault Captur is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 377 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1235 litres | 1172 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Renault Captur has 27 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 2008. The Peugeot 2008 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 63 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Renault Captur is 0.8 metres less than that of the Peugeot 2008, which means Renault Captur can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`658 | 1`656 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7800 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Renault Captur has
|
Peugeot 2008 has
| |