Peugeot Bipper 2010 vs Mazda 3 2006

 
Peugeot Bipper
2010 - 2015
Mazda 3
2006 - 2009
Body: Minivan / MPVHatchback
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.2 Diesel1.6 Diesel

Performance

Power: 75 HP109 HP
Torque: 190 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.6 seconds11.7 seconds
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving.
Peugeot Bipper engine produces 34 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 4.9 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.54.8
The Peugeot Bipper is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot Bipper consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Peugeot Bipper over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1140 km in combined cycle
1180 km on highway1340 km on highway
Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 3.96 m4.42 m
Width: 1.82 m1.76 m
Height: 1.72 m1.46 m
Peugeot Bipper is 46 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot Bipper is 26 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 360 litres300 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
884 litres635 litres
Peugeot Bipper has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot Bipper has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot Bipper (by 249 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means Peugeot Bipper can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7001`825
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 32001800
Pros and Cons: Peugeot Bipper has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
Mazda 3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv