Peugeot Bipper 2009 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 75 HP | 84 HP | |
| Torque: | 118 NM | 122 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 16.2 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda 3 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot Bipper engine produces 9 HP less power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Mazda 3. Due to the lower power, Peugeot Bipper reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 6.7 | |
| Peugeot Bipper consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Peugeot Bipper over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Mazda 3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 207, Peugeot 206, Citroen C2 | Used also on Mazda 2 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.96 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Peugeot Bipper is smaller, but higher. Peugeot Bipper is 46 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot Bipper is 26 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
884 litres | 635 litres | |
|
Peugeot Bipper has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot Bipper has 60 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot Bipper (by 249 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot Bipper is 0.9 metres less than that of the Mazda 3, which means Peugeot Bipper can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`680 | 1`715 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot Bipper has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |