Peugeot 508 2010 vs Mazda 6 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 155 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 193 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 508 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 508 engine produces 15 HP less power than Mazda 6, but torque is 127 NM more than Mazda 6. Despite less power, Peugeot 508 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 7.0 | |
|
The Peugeot 508 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 508 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that by driving the Peugeot 508 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1440 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1800 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 508 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 508 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Peugeot 307, Peugeot 308, Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 508 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 508 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Peugeot 508 2010 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 508 2010 2.0 engine Mazda 6 2010 2.0 engine: The engine tends to idle unevenly. Engine problems may also include the thermostat and cooling pump. This engine tends to consume more oil at higher mileages. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.81 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
|
Peugeot 508 is larger, but slightly lower. Peugeot 508 is 3 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 6 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 508 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 519 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
560 litres | 1751 litres | |
| Peugeot 508 has 41 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda 6 (by 1191 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 508 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 508 has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |