Peugeot 308 2011 vs Volvo C30 2009

 
Peugeot 308
2011 - 2013
Volvo C30
2009 - 2013
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel1.6 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing chain and beltTiming chain and belt

Performance

Power: 163 HP109 HP
Torque: 340 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.6 seconds11.3 seconds
Peugeot 308 is more dynamic to drive.
Peugeot 308 engine produces 54 HP more power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo C30. Thanks to more power Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.34.5
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Peugeot 308 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 308 could require 270 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 950 km in combined cycle1150 km in combined cycle
1150 km on highway1360 km on highway
Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Peugeot 308 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 6 years5 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Citroen C5, Peugeot 3008, Peugeot 508, Citroen DS4Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 308 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.28 m4.27 m
Width: 1.82 m1.78 m
Height: 1.50 m1.44 m
Peugeot 308 is larger.
Peugeot 308 is 1 cm longer than the Volvo C30, 3 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 308 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 348 litres251 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1201 litresno data
Peugeot 308 has more luggage capacity.
Peugeot 308 has 97 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Volvo C30.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9601`780
Safety: no data
Quality:
low

below average
Volvo C30 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 308 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 44004800
Pros and Cons: Peugeot 308 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Volvo C30 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv