Peugeot 308 2017 vs Renault Megane 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 99 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 254 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Megane is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 308 engine produces 31 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 66 NM less than Renault Megane. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 3.5 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 308 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 308 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Peugeot 308 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 308 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1510 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1700 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 1000 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 308 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Citroen C3, Peugeot 2008, Citroen C4, Opel Crossland | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.59 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 308 is 4 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 308 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 610 litres | 521 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1660 litres | 1504 litres | |
|
Peugeot 308 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 308 has 89 litres more trunk space than the Renault Megane. The Renault Megane may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 308 (by 156 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.8 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Peugeot 308 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 1`952 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 308 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Renault Megane, so Peugeot 308 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 400 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Renault Megane has
| |