Peugeot 308 2008 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 308 and Volvo V50 have the same engine power, but Peugeot 308 torque is 20 NM less than Volvo V50. Peugeot 308 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 5.8 | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 308 consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 308 could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1070 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Peugeot 308 2008 2.0 engine: The 2.0 HDI (DW10BTED4) engine is reliable and durable, with few issues in its mechanical components, but it does have some recurring problems. Early models featured a short camshaft timing chain that was prone to ... More about Peugeot 308 2008 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.50 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 308 is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo V50, 5 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 308 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 508 litres | 417 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1736 litres | no data | |
|
Peugeot 308 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 308 has 91 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. The Volvo V50 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Peugeot 308 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volvo V50, so Peugeot 308 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |