Peugeot 308 2011 vs Mazda CX-3 2014
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Peugeot 308 is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda CX-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 92 - 200 HP | 105 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 136 - 340 NM | 204 - 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 - 13 seconds | 8.7 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.0 - 7.7 | 4.0 - 6.4 | |
|
Peugeot 308 petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-3. On average, Peugeot 308 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.28 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Peugeot 308 is larger, but lower. Peugeot 308 and Mazda CX-3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1201 litres | 1260 litres | |
| Peugeot 308 has 2 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-3 (by 59 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`852 | ~ 1`814 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |