Peugeot 308 2007 vs Fiat Bravo 2007
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 1.9 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 90 - 175 HP | 90 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 136 - 320 NM | 128 - 305 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 - 11.5 seconds | 8.5 - 12.5 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 7.9 | 5.3 - 6.7 | |
Peugeot 308 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Fiat Bravo. On average, Peugeot 308 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Bravo. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.28 m | 4.34 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.79 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.50 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 308 is 6 cm shorter than the Fiat Bravo, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 348 litres | 400 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1398 litres | no data | |
Fiat Bravo has more luggage space. Peugeot 308 has 52 litres less trunk space than the Fiat Bravo. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Peugeot 308 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Fiat Bravo, which means Peugeot 308 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`845 | ~ 1`200 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | below average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2800 | 2600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 308 has
|
Fiat Bravo has
| |