Peugeot 307 2002 vs Volkswagen Bora 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 147 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Bora is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 307 engine produces 40 HP less power than Volkswagen Bora, whereas torque is 58 NM less than Volkswagen Bora. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 307 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.9 l/100km | 10.1 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 307 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 307 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora, which means that by driving the Peugeot 307 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 307 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Bora. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 610 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 307 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Volkswagen Bora 1998: Vehicle is equipped with 4motion automatic four-wheel drive. Under normal driving conditions, the torque distribution is 90% to the front axle and 10% to the rear axle. When wheel spin is detected, the multi-plate clutch engages and torque is evenly distributed between the axles (50%/50%). | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Citroen Xsara, Citroen C3, Peugeot 206, Peugeot 207 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine: Relatively reliable engine, the main problems tend to be with the engine control electronics. The engine is demanding on fuel quality and fuel consumption is relatively high. It is highly recommended to ... More about Peugeot 307 2002 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.42 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Peugeot 307 is larger. Peugeot 307 is 1 cm longer than the Volkswagen Bora, 2 cm wider, while the height of Peugeot 307 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 340 litres | 360 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1540 litres | 1370 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Peugeot 307 has 20 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Bora. This could mean that the Peugeot 307 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 170 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`923 | 1`965 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.9/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 307 has
|
Volkswagen Bora has
| |