Peugeot 307 2005 vs Citroen C4 2008
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Peugeot 307 engine produces 7 HP less power than Citroen C4, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Citroen C4. Despite less power, Peugeot 307 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.4 | 7.7 | |
|
The Citroen C4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 307 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Peugeot 307 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| Citroen C4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Peugeot 407, Citroen C5, Citroen C4, Citroen C4 Picasso | Used also on Peugeot 308 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 307 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 307 2005 2.0 engine: The Peugeot EW10A (RFJ) is a 2.0-liter naturally aspirated gasoline engine introduced in 2005 as an updated version of the older EW10J4, adapted to meet Euro 4 emissions standards. In general, the engine is considered fairly reliable and uncomplicated for its class, with relatively low repair costs and good overall durability when maintained ... More about Peugeot 307 2005 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.27 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.54 m | 1.46 m | |
| Peugeot 307 is 16 cm longer than the Citroen C4, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 307 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2211 litres | 1023 litres | |
|
Peugeot 307 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 307 has 200 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 307 (by 1188 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 307 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Citroen C4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`985 kg | 1`776 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`493 kg | 1`290 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 492 kg | 486 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Peugeot 307 has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Citroen C4, so Peugeot 307 quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 307 has
|
Citroen C4 has
| |