Peugeot 3008 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 3008 engine produces 35 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 3008 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 3008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 3008 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Peugeot 3008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 3008 consumes 2.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1420 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1500 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Peugeot 3008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 3008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 3008 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Peugeot 3008 2013 1.6 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.37 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Peugeot 3008 is smaller. Peugeot 3008 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1241 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Peugeot 3008 has 143 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 3008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`020 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7600 | 22 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 3008 has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |