Peugeot 207 2007 vs Mazda 3 2006
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 207 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 207 engine produces 15 HP more power than Mazda 3, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Mazda 3. Thanks to more power Peugeot 207 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.2 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 207 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 207 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3, which means that by driving the Peugeot 207 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 207 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda Xedos 6, Mazda MX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine: This engine is widely regarded as reliable, though it can develop certain issues over time. One of the most common problems is increased oil consumption, often starting after 120,000 km. This is frequently ... More about Mazda 3 2006 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.15 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Peugeot 207 is smaller, but higher. Peugeot 207 is 27 cm shorter than the Mazda 3, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 207 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 337 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1258 litres | 635 litres | |
|
Peugeot 207 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Peugeot 207 has 37 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 3. The Mazda 3 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 207 (by 623 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 207 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda 3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`705 | 1`725 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mazda 3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 207 has serious deffects in 60 percent more cases than Mazda 3, so Mazda 3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.8/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 207 has
|
Mazda 3 has
| |