Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Renault Captur 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 205 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 10 HP less power than Renault Captur, but torque is 15 NM more than Renault Captur. Despite less power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 5.4 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Captur, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Opel Combo, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Peugeot 2008 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Peugeot 2008 2013 1.2 engine: Because the timing belt is placed in oil, it doesn't last the intended 180,000 kilometers, and its wear products clog the oilways. First years of engines have been recalled due to axial play in the crankshaft. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.12 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.57 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 4 cm longer than the Renault Captur, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 377 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1172 litres | 1235 litres | |
|
Renault Captur has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Peugeot 2008 has 27 litres less trunk space than the Renault Captur. This could mean that the Peugeot 2008 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Captur (by 63 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Renault Captur, which means Peugeot 2008 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`656 | 1`726 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Peugeot 2008 is better rated in child safety tests. The Renault Captur scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Renault Captur has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Renault Captur, so Renault Captur quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8000 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Renault Captur has
| |