Peugeot 2008 2013 vs Nissan Qashqai 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is a more dynamic driving. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 43 HP less power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Nissan Qashqai. Due to the lower power, Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Peugeot 2008 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 1080 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 670 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan Qashqai can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan Qashqai version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Nissan Qashqai 2015 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Citroen C5, Citroen C4 Picasso, Peugeot 3008, Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Juke, Nissan Pulsar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Peugeot 2008 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.16 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.56 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is smaller. Peugeot 2008 is 22 cm shorter than the Nissan Qashqai, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Peugeot 2008 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 350 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1194 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage space. Peugeot 2008 has 80 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 391 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`644 kg | 1`885 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`080 kg | 1`315 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 564 kg | 570 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |