Peugeot 2008 2019 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 155 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 207 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Peugeot 2008 is more dynamic to drive. Peugeot 2008 engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda CX-3, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Mazda CX-3. Thanks to more power Peugeot 2008 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.0 | 6.7 | |
|
The Peugeot 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Peugeot 2008 consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-3, which means that by driving the Peugeot 2008 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 41 litres | 44 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 810 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 720 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Mazda CX-3 2018: AWD system provides 98% of power to the front under normal conditions and can shift up to 50% of torque to the rear if wheels slip. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-3 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Citroen C4 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-3 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-3 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-3 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.30 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.54 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Peugeot 2008 is 3 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 434 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1467 litres | 1260 litres | |
|
Peugeot 2008 has more luggage capacity. Peugeot 2008 has 84 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-3. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Peugeot 2008 (by 207 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Peugeot 2008 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`748 | 1`808 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Mazda CX-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Peugeot 2008 has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Mazda CX-3, so Mazda CX-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 17 400 | 14 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Peugeot 2008 has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |