Opel Frontera 1998 vs Toyota RAV4 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.9 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Opel Frontera engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 10 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Opel Frontera reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.2 | 7.1 | |
|
The Toyota RAV4 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Opel Frontera consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Frontera could require 315 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 57 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 700 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| Toyota RAV4 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Frontera engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Omega, Opel Sintra | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Opel Frontera engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota RAV4 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.27 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.69 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Opel Frontera is larger, but slightly lower. Opel Frontera is 1 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm wider, while the height of Opel Frontera is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 320 litres | 400 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1137 litres | 1150 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Opel Frontera has 80 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Opel Frontera uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 13 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`300 | 1`930 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Opel Frontera has serious deffects in 380 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Frontera has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |