Opel Antara 2007 vs Nissan Qashqai 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12 seconds | |
| Opel Antara and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Opel Antara reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.6 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.9 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Opel Antara consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Opel Antara could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Opel Antara consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 590 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.85 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Opel Antara is larger. Opel Antara is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 7 cm wider, while the height of Opel Antara is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Opel Antara is 1.4 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Opel Antara can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 7.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Opel Antara has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |