Nissan X-Trail 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 47 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.6 | |
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
730 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Nissan X-Trail has 4x4: It has selectable four-wheel drive with Auto, 2WD and Lock modes. In Auto mode, it has front-wheel drive under normal conditions, the rear axle engages when the front wheels start to slip, and power is distributed variably up to 50:50 front to rear. In 2WD mode, the transfer clutch is permanently unlocked, but the electronic control unit can engage the rear wheels occasionally, for example during hard acceleration. In Lock mode, the transfer clutch is permanently locked, providing a constant 50:50 power distribution. When vehicle speed increases above 30 km/h (20 mph), it switches to Auto mode, but when speed decreases, it switches back to Lock mode. The system also switches to 2WD mode in the event of overheating. | |||
Engines | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Nissan X-Trail 2016 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.38 m | |
Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.72 m | 1.59 m | |
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 13 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1982 litres | 1585 litres | |
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 120 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 397 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.7 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`240 | 2`005 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | average | |
Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 11 800 | 10 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |