Nissan X-Trail 2016 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.6 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 47 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.6 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1585 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 295 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 292 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | 2`005 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 800 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |