Nissan X-Trail 2017 vs Toyota RAV4 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Toyota RAV4) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 206 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota RAV4 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 19 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 114 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 195 mm (7.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2017 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2017 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.69 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.69 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 9 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 135 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 135 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 550 litres | 580 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1877 litres | no data | |
| In 5-seat version Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space (by 30 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`310 kg | 2`090 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`590 kg | 1`610 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 720 kg | 480 kg | |
| Nissan X-Trail load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem more than Toyota RAV4. Therefore, Nissan X-Trail is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | above average | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 120 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 24 600 | 23 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |