Nissan X-Trail 2005 vs Dacia Duster 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 192 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.3 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is more dynamic to drive. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 35 HP more power than Dacia Duster, whereas torque is 44 NM more than Dacia Duster. Thanks to more power Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Dacia Duster is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 240 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Dacia Duster engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Primera, Nissan Serena, Nissan Sentra | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Renault Megane, Nissan Almera, Dacia Logan, Renault Kangoo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dacia Duster might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Dacia Duster 2010 1.6 engine: The Renault K4M 1.6 16V is one of the most durable and well-known engines in its class. It is simple, widely used, and generally not demanding, with many well-maintained examples reaching 400,000–500,000 km. The engine is not especially modern or economical by current standards, but it has a ... More about Dacia Duster 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.51 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.63 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 20 cm longer than the Dacia Duster, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 475 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1841 litres | 1604 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 237 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.2 metres less than that of the Dacia Duster. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`710 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Dacia Duster has
| |