Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Nissan X-Trail) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda CX-5) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.4 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan X-Trail engine produces 20 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, but torque is 110 NM more than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.3 | |
|
The Nissan X-Trail is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan X-Trail consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that by driving the Nissan X-Trail over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| Nissan X-Trail gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan X-Trail 2014 1.6 engine Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 10 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1620 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 87 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 257 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | Nissan X-Trail has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda CX-5, so Nissan X-Trail quality could be a bit better. | ||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |