Nissan X-Trail 2014 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Nissan X-Trail and Nissan Qashqai have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan X-Trail reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan X-Trail could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan X-Trail consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1220 km in combined cycle | 1240 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1410 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.82 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is larger. Nissan X-Trail is 26 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 2 cm wider, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 550 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1877 litres | 1585 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage capacity. Nissan X-Trail has 120 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 292 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`310 | 1`960 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 11 800 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |