Nissan X-Trail 2007 vs Toyota RAV4 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan X-Trail is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota RAV4 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Nissan X-Trail also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 | 2.0 - 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 - 173 HP | 136 - 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 - 360 NM | 194 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 - 12.5 seconds | 9.3 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 - 9.6 | 6.6 - 10.3 | |
|
Nissan X-Trail petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Toyota RAV4. On average, Nissan X-Trail equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.68 m | 1.70 m | |
| Nissan X-Trail is 23 cm longer than the Toyota RAV4, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan X-Trail is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 479 litres | 586 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1742 litres | 1470 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Nissan X-Trail has 107 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. This could mean that the Nissan X-Trail uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 272 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan X-Trail is 0.6 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4, which means Nissan X-Trail can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`079 | ~ 2`134 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan X-Trail has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |