Nissan Terrano 2002 vs Land Rover Discovery 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Double-row timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 154 HP | 137 HP | |
| Torque: | 304 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.5 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Terrano is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Terrano engine produces 17 HP more power than Land Rover Discovery, whereas torque is 4 NM more than Land Rover Discovery. Thanks to more power Nissan Terrano reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.1 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.6 l/100km | 9.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Nissan Terrano consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery, which means that by driving the Nissan Terrano over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Terrano consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Discovery. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 93 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1050 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 830 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Discovery gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - Full time 4WD | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Discovery engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 25 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan Patrol | Used also on Land Rover Defender | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Terrano might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.73 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 1.90 m | |
| Nissan Terrano is 3 cm longer than the Land Rover Discovery, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | 1290 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | 1970 litres | |
|
Land Rover Discovery has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Terrano has 1175 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Discovery. This could mean that the Nissan Terrano uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Land Rover Discovery (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Discovery, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 3`000 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Land Rover Discovery has
| |