Nissan Terrano 1993 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 1990
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | no data | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 101 HP | 91 HP | |
| Torque: | 221 NM | 188 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 19.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Terrano engine produces 10 HP more power than Toyota Land Cruiser, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Toyota Land Cruiser. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 95 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 530'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 22 years | 27 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Land Cruiser might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.58 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.81 m | 2.07 m | |
|
Nissan Terrano is smaller. Nissan Terrano is 42 cm shorter than the Toyota Land Cruiser, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Terrano is 26 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 115 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1900 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Terrano is 0.5 metres less than that of the Toyota Land Cruiser, which means Nissan Terrano can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`580 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Terrano has
|
Toyota Land Cruiser has
| |