Nissan Serena 2010 vs Mazda CX-5 2012
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 187 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Serena engine produces 21 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 23 NM less than Mazda CX-5. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.3 | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2012 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.77 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.73 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.85 m | 1.67 m | |
| Nissan Serena is 23 cm longer than the Mazda CX-5, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Serena is 18 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 521 litres | 463 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Nissan Serena has more luggage capacity. Nissan Serena has 58 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.2 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Serena has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |