Nissan Qashqai 2021 vs Volvo XC40 2018
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 158 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 270 NM | 300 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
Volvo XC40 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 32 HP less power than Volvo XC40, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo XC40. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.6 | |
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 54 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
1120 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.43 m | 4.43 m | |
Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai and Volvo XC40 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 460 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1447 litres | no data | |
Volvo XC40 has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 24 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC40. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`160 | |
Safety: | |||
The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 24 400 | 24 200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |