Nissan Qashqai 2021 vs Volvo XC40 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Qashqai) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo XC40) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 8 HP more power than Volvo XC40, but torque is 80 NM less than Volvo XC40. Thanks to more power Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo XC40 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 54 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.43 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai and Volvo XC40 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1447 litres | no data | |
|
Volvo XC40 has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 24 litres less trunk space than the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo XC40. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 600 | 22 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Volvo XC40 has
| |