Nissan Qashqai 2021 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Petrol engines (Nissan Qashqai) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Land Rover Range Rover Evoque) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences. | |||
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 158 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 NM | 380 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 8 HP more power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, but torque is 110 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Thanks to more power Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.3 l/100km | 7.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1160 km in combined cycle | |
| 1120 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Land Rover Range Rover Evoque gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Nissan X-Trail | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine: No major systemic issues have been identified with this engine over the years. The most commonly reported concerns—though not widespread—include unstable idle, intake valve contamination, and complaints ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2021 1.3 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2018 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.43 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.63 m | 1.65 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 436 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1447 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 155 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.1 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.5 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`985 | 2`490 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 23 400 | 28 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |