Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 247 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 329 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Pajero is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 132 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 164 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 13.4 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Qashqai consumes 7.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 1140 litres of fuel. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`880 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 13 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |