Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Seat Ateca 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 165 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.9 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Seat Ateca is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 35 HP less power than Seat Ateca, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Seat Ateca. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Ateca is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 45 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Seat Ateca 2016 1.4 engine: The 1.4 TSI engine from the EA211 family (code CZEA, 150 hp) is a modern turbocharged unit designed to balance performance and efficiency. It features direct fuel injection, a timing belt drive, and the ACT cylinder deactivation system, which shuts down two cylinders under light load to reduce fuel consumption. In everyday use the engine offers good ... More about Seat Ateca 2016 1.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.60 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm longer than the Seat Ateca, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1585 litres | no data | |
|
Seat Ateca has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres less than that of the Seat Ateca. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`880 kg | 1`910 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`285 kg | 1`289 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 595 kg | 621 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Seat Ateca has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 110 percent more cases than Seat Ateca, so Seat Ateca quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 8200 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Seat Ateca has
| |