Nissan Qashqai 2014 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 146 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 187 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 2 HP less power than Toyota RAV4, but torque is 13 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Despite less power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.8 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota RAV4 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Camry | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota RAV4 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine: Owners often report increasing oil consumption, which becomes particularly pronounced over time. Additionally, the water pump has a limited service life, and after 150,000 km, the timing chain tends to ... More about Toyota RAV4 2013 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 19 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 147 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`110 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 95 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 12 200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |