Nissan Qashqai 2014 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 144 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 200 NM | 208 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda CX-5, whereas torque is 8 NM less than Mazda CX-5. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 6.7 | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda CX-5 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda MX-5, Mazda CX-3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mazda CX-5 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mazda CX-5 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is not well-suited for low-quality fuel, as it quickly clogs the fuel system. The use of substandard fuel often leads to the failure of expensive ignition coils, resulting in significant repair ... More about Mazda CX-5 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.60 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 18 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1620 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 73 litres less trunk space than the Mazda CX-5. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 1 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`950 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | above average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mazda CX-5 has
| |