Nissan Qashqai 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 10 HP more power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 20 NM less than Honda CR-V. Despite the higher power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1000 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
| Honda CR-V gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Nissan Qashqai engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 20 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 955 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 565 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`085 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |