Nissan Qashqai 2008 vs Opel Antara 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai and Opel Antara have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.6 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Antara. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chevrolet Captiva, Chevrolet Epica, Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2008 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 26 cm shorter than the Opel Antara, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 1420 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 100 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 1.4 metres less than that of the Opel Antara, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`320 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 4400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Opel Antara has
| |