Nissan Qashqai 2008 vs Honda CR-V 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 10 HP less power than Honda CR-V, but torque is 4 NM more than Honda CR-V. Despite less power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Honda CR-V 2007: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | Used also on Honda Accord | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine: This engine is sensitive to both fuel and oil quality. Using low-grade gasoline can quickly damage the catalytic converter and lead to premature failure of the oxygen sensors.
Many Honda owners are annoyed ... More about Honda CR-V 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 20 cm shorter than the Honda CR-V, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 556 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 556 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 955 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 565 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.8 metres less than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`108 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Honda CR-V has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 105 percent more cases than Honda CR-V, so Honda CR-V quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 5000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.2/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Honda CR-V has
| |