Nissan Qashqai 2008 vs Jeep Cherokee 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 177 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 460 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Jeep Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 74 HP less power than Jeep Cherokee, whereas torque is 220 NM less than Jeep Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 9.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 10.8 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 3.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 585 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 4.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Cherokee engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 17 cm shorter than the Jeep Cherokee, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 878 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 878 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.2 metres more than that of the Jeep Cherokee. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`520 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Jeep Cherokee has
| |