Nissan Qashqai 2008 vs Nissan X-Trail 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
|
Nissan X-Trail is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 47 HP less power than Nissan X-Trail, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Nissan X-Trail. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan X-Trail might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Nissan X-Trail engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.68 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 31 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 7 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 479 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 479 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.2 metres more than that of the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |