Nissan Qashqai 2008 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 117 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi ASX is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, but torque is 86 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.1 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 1060 km with real consumption | 910 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.62 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 1 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 1219 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 301 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX, which means Nissan Qashqai can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`870 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 155 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 6600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |