Nissan Qashqai 2008 vs Jeep Compass 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 103 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Jeep Compass is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 37 HP less power than Jeep Compass, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Jeep Compass. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.5 | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Nissan Qashqai consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Compass, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 51 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1350 km on highway | 940 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
|
Jeep Compass 2006: It has Freedom Drive I - an electronically controlled four-wheel drive system. Normally the car is in front-wheel drive, but if wheel slip is detected, it can automatically send up to 50% power to the rear wheels. The system is primarily designed for snow and similar conditions with limited traction. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Renault Clio, Renault Megane, Dacia Logan, Nissan Note | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Jeep Compass engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.32 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.61 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 8 cm shorter than the Jeep Compass, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 334 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 410 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 334 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1520 litres | 1277 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 243 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.3 metres less than that of the Jeep Compass. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 5200 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Jeep Compass has
| |