Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Toyota C-HR 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 142 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.1 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 19 HP more power than Toyota C-HR, whereas torque is 54 NM more than Toyota C-HR. Thanks to more power Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.9 | 3.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.0 l/100km | 5.3 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota C-HR is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Nissan Qashqai could require 450 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 4.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 43 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 940 km in combined cycle | 1100 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota C-HR gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota C-HR engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.56 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm longer than the Toyota C-HR, width is practically the same , while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 377 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage capacity. Nissan Qashqai has 53 litres more trunk space than the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.3 metres less than that of the Toyota C-HR. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`890 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 21 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Toyota C-HR has
| |