Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2012
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 141 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 196 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai engine produces 9 HP less power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.9 | |
| Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 840 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander, Peugeot 4008 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi ASX might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 8 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 384 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1219 litres | |
|
Nissan Qashqai has more luggage capacity. Nissan Qashqai has 46 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`865 | 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |