Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Mitsubishi ASX 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is more dynamic to drive. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 16 HP more power than Mitsubishi ASX, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mitsubishi ASX. Thanks to more power Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi ASX is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1320 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1440 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 970 km with real consumption | 950 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Ground clearance: | 182 mm (7.2 inches) | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.63 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Nissan Qashqai is 8 cm longer than the Mitsubishi ASX, 3 cm wider, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 419 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1219 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 11 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi ASX. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 366 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi ASX. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | high | |
| Mitsubishi ASX has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Mitsubishi ASX, so Mitsubishi ASX quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mitsubishi ASX has
| |