Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Nissan X-Trail 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai and Nissan X-Trail have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1240 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1410 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 910 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 180 mm (7.1 inches) | 210 mm (8.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Nissan X-Trail can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Nissan X-Trail version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from seven 4x4 versions of Nissan X-Trail 2014 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 14 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.71 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 26 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1877 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Nissan Qashqai has 120 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan X-Trail (by 292 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.5 metres less than that of the Nissan X-Trail, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`960 | 2`310 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Nissan Qashqai has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan X-Trail has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Nissan Qashqai, so Nissan Qashqai quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 11 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |