Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 3.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 373 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
| Nissan Qashqai engine produces 40 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 53 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 11.9 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 5.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 885 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 5.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.39 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.85 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai and Mitsubishi Pajero are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 16 000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.5/10 | 9.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |