Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 20 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 740 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Land Rover Range Rover Evoque engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Jaguar XF, Land Rover Discovery Sport | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine: This engine is recognized for its reliability, power, and relatively low fuel consumption, as well as its durability in demanding conditions without frequent failures. However, it is sensitible to oil quality ... More about Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2013 2.2 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.61 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 550 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 120 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | 2`350 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 23 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |