Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | n/a NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 60 HP less power than Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 6.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine: This 1.6-liter diesel engine is a joint development by Renault-Nissan engineers. It features a cast-iron block, a 16-valve cylinder head with hydraulic lifters, a chain-driven timing system, and a Bosch Common ... More about Nissan Qashqai 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.97 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.64 m | |
| Nissan Qashqai is 1 cm longer than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, 17 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 575 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | no data | |
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Nissan Qashqai has 145 litres less trunk space than the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque. This could mean that the Nissan Qashqai uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.6 metres less than that of the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, which means Nissan Qashqai can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Nissan Qashqai scores higher in safety tests, but Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is better rated in child safety tests. The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 13 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque has
| |