Nissan Qashqai 2013 vs Hyundai ix35 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 383 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Hyundai ix35 is a more dynamic driving. Nissan Qashqai engine produces 54 HP less power than Hyundai ix35, whereas torque is 63 NM less than Hyundai ix35. Due to the lower power, Nissan Qashqai reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.8 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Nissan Qashqai is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Nissan Qashqai consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35, which means that by driving the Nissan Qashqai over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Nissan Qashqai consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 960 km on highway | ||
| 800 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
| Nissan Qashqai gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Hyundai Santa FE, Kia Sportage, Hyundai Tucson, Kia Sorento | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.38 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.59 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Nissan Qashqai is smaller. Nissan Qashqai is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai ix35, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Nissan Qashqai is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 591 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1585 litres | 1436 litres | |
| Nissan Qashqai has 161 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai ix35. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Qashqai (by 149 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Nissan Qashqai is 0.1 metres less than that of the Hyundai ix35. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`005 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Hyundai ix35 is better rated in child safety tests. The Nissan Qashqai scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Hyundai ix35 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Hyundai ix35, so Hyundai ix35 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Nissan Qashqai has
|
Hyundai ix35 has
| |